In response to TKinLA: I don't trust any brand to be cruelty free unless it has the bunny drawing that states "cruelty free" right on the packaging. Just because one of the ingredients isn't animal derived doesn't mean the other aren't or that they don't test on animals. This product contains stearates, which are usually animal derived. If the company doesn't proudly exclaim it on their website, that's usually a bad sign. If it's important factor for you, try Ole Henrickson (which is also paraben free and very effective).
Sephora does not have any brand in their stores that test on animals. I saw that on a sign in one of the stores.
answered 7 years, 5 months ago
I'm a vegan, and am pretty familiar with which brands are cruelty-free, and TOTALLY 100% cruelty-free, i.e., source ingredients are not animal-derived (AND insect-derived...sorry BURT), and are not tested on animals. philosophy is indeed 100% cruelty-free. I contacted philosophy regarding the lactic acid in this product. ME to philosophy: "A critical ingredient in "hope in a jar" is "Lactic Acid", which is found in animal blood and muscle tissue; as well as, in sour milk, beer, sauerkraut, pickles, and other food products made by bacterial fermentation. Will Lactic Acid be replaced with alternatives, such as plant milk sugars and/or synthetics? Thanks in advance for your prompt response." philosophy rep to ME: "thank you for contacting philosophy! the lactic acid used in the hope in a jar is derived from a non-animal, synthetic based biofermentation process. i hope this information is helpful."
answered 7 years, 8 months ago